<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keystone XL Pipeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:09:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=245</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statement from Koch &#124; KochFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Statement from Koch &#124; KochFacts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As previously stated, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the Keystone XL Pipeline and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of oil delivered by this pipeline. This fact was affirmed in this November 2011 statement to Reuter’s by TransCanada’s CEO. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As previously stated, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the Keystone XL Pipeline and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of oil delivered by this pipeline. This fact was affirmed in this November 2011 statement to Reuter’s by TransCanada’s CEO. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koch Presence in Canada – The Facts &#124; KochFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Koch Presence in Canada – The Facts &#124; KochFacts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 19:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with regard to the Keystone XL pipeline, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the proposed project and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with regard to the Keystone XL pipeline, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the proposed project and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facts Refute Environmentalist Claims About Keystone XL Pipeline</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Facts Refute Environmentalist Claims About Keystone XL Pipeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] website: Koch has consistently and repeatedly stated (including here, here, here, and here) that we have no financial interest whatsoever in the Keystone pipeline. In addition, this fact has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] website: Koch has consistently and repeatedly stated (including here, here, here, and here) that we have no financial interest whatsoever in the Keystone pipeline. In addition, this fact has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#124; Missouri News Horizon</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>&#124; Missouri News Horizon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] website: Koch has consistently and repeatedly stated (including here, here, here, and here) that we have no financial interest whatsoever in the Keystone pipeline. In addition, this fact has [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] website: Koch has consistently and repeatedly stated (including here, here, here, and here) that we have no financial interest whatsoever in the Keystone pipeline. In addition, this fact has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keystone XL pipeline unites left and right &#171; Montana Votes</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Keystone XL pipeline unites left and right &#171; Montana Votes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 02:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] right,” there is no proof that Koch Industries will profit from this pipeline. Koch Industries denies supporting the project, although they are interested in it. A Koch subsidary filed for “intervenor” status [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] right,” there is no proof that Koch Industries will profit from this pipeline. Koch Industries denies supporting the project, although they are interested in it. A Koch subsidary filed for “intervenor” status [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Dishonesty from InsideClimate News &#124; KochFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>More Dishonesty from InsideClimate News &#124; KochFacts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] InsideClimate News.&#8221;  Yet we have detailed repeatedly (including here, here, here, and here) in response to these allegations by Congressman Waxman and InsideClimate that we have no financial [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] InsideClimate News.&#8221;  Yet we have detailed repeatedly (including here, here, here, and here) in response to these allegations by Congressman Waxman and InsideClimate that we have no financial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UPDATE Continuing Falsehoods from InsideClimate and its Owner, David Sassoon &#124; KochFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>UPDATE Continuing Falsehoods from InsideClimate and its Owner, David Sassoon &#124; KochFacts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and his editorial partners at Reuters for many months now, as evidenced here, here, here, and here).  Even on this latest article, we provided formal comment to InsideClimate earlier this week (not [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and his editorial partners at Reuters for many months now, as evidenced here, here, here, and here).  Even on this latest article, we provided formal comment to InsideClimate earlier this week (not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koch Subsidiary Told Regulators It Has ‘Direct and Substantial Interest’ in Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline » Global Activist Network</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Koch Subsidiary Told Regulators It Has ‘Direct and Substantial Interest’ in Keystone XL Tar Sands Pipeline » Global Activist Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 01:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Koch Industries repeats its non-denial denial here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Koch Industries repeats its non-denial denial here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Setting the Record Straight on Keystone &#124; KochFacts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Setting the Record Straight on Keystone &#124; KochFacts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on Keystone   var addthis_product = &#039;wpp-256&#039;; var addthis_config = {&quot;data_track_clickback&quot;:true};As previously stated, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the Keystone pipeline. We are not party to its design or [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Keystone   var addthis_product = &#039;wpp-256&#039;; var addthis_config = {&quot;data_track_clickback&quot;:true};As previously stated, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the Keystone pipeline. We are not party to its design or [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koch Brothers Interfere At Keystone XL Public Meeting</title>
		<link>http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/keystone-xl-pipeline/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Koch Brothers Interfere At Keystone XL Public Meeting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kochfacts.com/kf/?p=878#comment-127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Koch brothers stand to gain if Keystone XL is approved. In response, the secretive Koch brothers claimed they had “no financial stake” and had not taken a position on the issue. Yesterday’s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Koch brothers stand to gain if Keystone XL is approved. In response, the secretive Koch brothers claimed they had “no financial stake” and had not taken a position on the issue. Yesterday’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
