Mayer

Monday, April 25th, 2011

UPDATE – Letter to American Society of Magazine Editors Objecting to New Yorker Magazine Recognition

Mr. Sid Holt
Chief Executive
American Society of Magazine Editors

Dear Mr. Holt:

On behalf of Koch Industries, Inc., I am writing to raise serious concerns about an August 30, 2010 New Yorker article, Covert Operations, by Jane Mayer, which has been nominated for the American Society of Magazine Editors’ (“ASME”) National Magazine Award in the category of Reporting. We previously raised these concerns directly with The New Yorker, which was dismissive of our concerns. As explained in my September 28, 2010 letter to the magazine, Ms. Mayer’s article overwhelmingly relied on sources whose backgrounds and biases were not fully disclosed, obscured key facts from readers, and distorted many other facts about Koch Industries, Charles Koch, and David Koch. Her article is ideologically slanted and a prime example of a disturbing trend in journalism, where agenda-driven advocacy masquerades as objective reporting. Given these facts, it would be inappropriate for ASME to give Ms. Mayer’s article an award in Reporting. There’s nothing wrong with opinion journalism, of course, and indeed ASME has separate awards that rightfully recognize that form. The “Essays and Criticism” category, for instance, applies to “opinions of the writer on topics ranging from the personal to the political.”

Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

UPDATE New Yorker tries to resist correction despite demonstrable facts.

Pamela McCarthy, Deputy Editor
The New Yorker

Pamela – thank you for your note. We are surprised that your apparent understanding of the word “preemptive” does not match the dictionary definition, which is this:

pre·emp·tive : taken as a measure against something possible, anticipated, or feared; preventive; deterrent.

All the best,

Melissa Cohlmia
Director, Corporate Communication
Koch Companies Public Sector, LLC

Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

Holding The New Yorker Magazine Accountable for Error in Jane Mayer Piece

In a piece published on the magazine’s website on October 20th, writer Jane Mayer falsely wrote that Koch is “vowing that Americans for Prosperity will spend some $200 million in the 2012 Presidential campaign in hopes of defeating President Obama.”  But Koch has never said, let alone vowed, any such thing.  It is mistaken at best, made up at worst.

We brought the error to the attention of the magazine yet the editors are disavowing responsibility for the falsehood.  So that readers are not further misled, we are setting the record straight here ourselves.
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Tuesday, October 25th, 2011

More Distortions from Jane Mayer and New Yorker

Advocacy journalism is once again on display at the New Yorker in Jane Mayer’s latest distortions regarding Koch.  The piece relies on an Associated Press report from October 16th that implies we have some involvement with Herman Cain’s presidential campaign.  We don’t.

Here is the statement that we released publicly on the matter on October 18:

“We have long admired Herman Cain for his success in growing jobs and business in this country, and for his long-standing commitment to the values of economic freedom. Although we have not formally committed to supporting any presidential candidate, we are certainly glad to see Mr. Cain confront the issues of runaway spending and stifling government interference that are holding back the economy and the lives of all Americans. Anyone that has spent time with Mr. Cain, as we have, can tell you he is a man of deep dedication to our nation and his independence of thought is obviously what is appealing to voters.”That statement was posted a full two days prior to Ms. Mayer’s piece and yet she ignored it entirely.  We received no call from her editors to verify the piece and if any fact checker has reviewed it, we certainly haven’t heard from them. Here are several other flaws in Ms. Mayer’s account, excerpted from her piece:
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

The New Yorker’s Koch story is not credible journalism

Rather than researching and writing a well-reasoned piece that reflects a complete picture, Jane Mayer and her editors chose to print a blatantly one-sided and partial article based largely on information provided by left-leaning sources with underlying objectives. It is ironic that Mayer baselessly accuses the Kochs of using “slippery organizations with generic-sounding names” and of being “covert” when she herself employs such tactics in her article.

Click Here For Full Post »

Share |