Environment

Monday, May 14th, 2012

Koch Presence in Canada – The Facts

Koch companies have had a presence in Canada for decades.  Our businesses – including Flint Hills Resources, Koch Fertilizer, Georgia-Pacific, Koch Exploration, Koch-Glitsch, Koch Heat Transfer and INVISTA – employ more than 2,000 people in manufacturing, trading, marketing and sales throughout Canada.  This publicly available Canada fact sheet provides information about Koch’s diverse operations, safety and environmental commitment, and community stewardship in Canada.

Our Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend Refinery in Rosemount, Minn., was built in the 1950s specifically to handle heavy Canadian crude oil. Koch purchased controlling interest in the refinery in 1969. Today, Pine Bend is one of the safest and cleanest refineries operating in theUnited States and in the top quartile for energy efficiency.  Pine Bend is also among the top processors of Canadian oil in the U.S. and a leader in providing cleaner-burning fuels including gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, propane and butane as well as other petroleum products such as asphalt. The Canadian oil we process is shipped to the refinery via pipeline systems that have been in operation for decades.

Canadian oil is a critically important resource for the United States. A stable and friendly trading partner, Canada is the United States’ number one supplier of imported oil, and has about 15 percent of the world’s oil reserves, second only to Saudi Arabia. Canada’s oil sands will be developed – if not for the U.S., then for other countries.  The U.S. is the most efficient and environmentally responsible transportation destination for Canadian oil.

Finally, with regard to the Keystone XL pipeline, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the proposed project and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of oil delivered by this pipeline. This was verified by TransCanada’s CEO in a November 2011 statement.

Share |

Sunday, March 18th, 2012
Share |

Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

Koch Responds to Rep. Waxman’s false public comments

“A series of ongoing, politically motivated attacks by Representative Waxman and others are part of an orchestrated campaign to demonize an American company with 50,000 U.S.-based employees. This should be concerning to all Americans who exercise their Constitutional right to free speech.

At a hearing of the Committee on Energy and Commerce on January 25, Rep. Henry Waxman repeated several demonstrably false statements he had made earlier this year, asserting that Koch has some financial stake in the Keystone Pipeline project.  In particular, Mr. Waxman said at the hearing, ‘We learned that [Koch] told the Canadian government they have a direct and substantial interest so something does not add up.’

As we have previously stated, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the Keystone pipeline and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of oil delivered by this pipeline. We have taken no position on the legislative proposal at issue before Congress and we are not cited in any way in that legislation.
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Tuesday, December 13th, 2011

Debunking Conspiracy Theories in Wisconsin

Earlier this year, Koch became the object of considerable misinformation and mischaracterization in Wisconsin as news media and liberal bloggers attempted to link us to the state’s budget repair bill. We stated at the time that these assertions were false and ultimately even the media that had spread this misleading story were forced to recognize that it was false.  We see a similar ploy emerging today as an obscure, secretive blog in Wisconsin makes a conspiratorial claim that Koch is involved in a “covert…expressway of influence” in Wisconsin to advance mining legislation in the state.  Koch would “profit greatly,” so this blogger’s theory goes, “through materials and systems for [Koch's] mining operations.”

Before another lie gains traction, these are the facts: Koch has no mining operations in Wisconsin, no plans for any such operation, no financial interest in the proposed iron mine in the state, and has taken no position on any Wisconsin legislation related to mining.  Koch companies have never been involved in lobbying for this bill, either directly or through any other party.  Any suggestion that Koch companies or any of our 3,000 Wisconsin employees are secretly pursuing this project is flat out false.

The blog, by the way, is written by anonymous authors.  Readers would be right to question why the bloggers are so worried about alleged ”shadowy” participants in Wisconsin public discourse, yet conceal their own identities from the public.

Share |

Friday, November 4th, 2011

UPDATE Koch Confronts Dishonesty from Democratic National Committee

Ms. Melanie Roussell
Press Secretary, Democratic National Committee

Dear Ms. Roussell:

A laundry list of critics including almost every national news outlet, innumerable bloggers and citizens, and an ongoing congressional inquiry have pointed out that the Administration’s loan guarantees to the now bankrupt solar company, Solyndra, were a galling mistake.  But instead of answering those questions honestly or owning up to the boondoggle, the Democratic National Committee (DNC) sent out a press release under your name on November 2 attacking Koch.  You wrote, “It shouldn’t shock anyone that the Koch brothers are shilling for their oil company by funding attack ads against clean energy investments.  They are defending their own interests — the Koch Industries oil and gas conglomerate.”

This is simply dishonest.  For a start, Solyndra is not a competitor of ours.  Bankrupt companies, by definition, are not competitive.  It seems odd that the DNC still regards Solyndra as something that is “investing in America” but, then again, that is the kind of thinking that wasted more than $500 million of taxpayer money on the project in the first place.
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Friday, October 28th, 2011

Statement from Charles Koch Foundation on Professor Richard A. Muller’s work with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Koch Industries supports the Charles Koch Foundation, which recently issued the following statement on the recent research conducted by the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Project.

“The Charles Koch Foundation has long supported, and will continue to support, sound, nonpartisan scientific research intended to benefit society by informing public policy and advancing an understanding of the costs and benefits of proposed solutions. Among the research the foundation recently supported is a project by Professor Richard A. Muller in partnership with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and several other foundations. That research is undergoing peer review now but has already received significant media interest. The research examined recent global surface temperature trends. It did not examine ocean temperature data or the cause of warming on our climate, as some have claimed,” said Tonya Mullins, director of communications for the foundation.

Share |

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

More Dishonesty from InsideClimate News

The latest article about Koch by InsideClimate News is a prime example of the agenda-driven, dishonest journalism that is so characteristic of coverage on the Keystone pipeline.  Here is how the InsideClimate approach works:

  • Manufacture a “news” item out of something utterly ordinary.
  • Distort the meaning of the event.
  • Disregard anything that doesn’t fit the narrative, even when the target of the attack explicitly points out the facts.
  • Then give prominent, positive attention to any politician that tries to parade the distortion.

Here are the specifics:
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

UPDATE Continuing Falsehoods from InsideClimate and its Owner, David Sassoon

InsideClimate News has published a “reply” to the statement we provided them on their latest story on the Keystone pipeline — a statement that they refused to run in full.  The reply itself, however, is shot through with further falsehoods.  We detail them here both to set the record straight and as further notice to readers and legitimate news outlets alike that InsideClimate is being willfully deceptive in its coverage of Koch:
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

Setting the Record Straight on Keystone

As previously stated, Koch Industries has no financial stake in the Keystone pipeline and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of oil delivered by this pipeline. We have taken no position on the legislative proposal at issue before Congress and we are not cited in any way in that legislation.

This is just the latest of many false allegations initiated by InsideClimateNews and advanced by aligned advocacy media. It is also evidence that those promoting these falsehoods do not even do the basic due diligence before attacking Koch industries. A rudimentary fact check by any legitimate investigator or reporter would reveal the clear difference between “intervening” in an application in Canada’s National Energy Board hearings, and “having an interest” in the pipeline. By definition, an intervener is anyone who wants to learn more about a project. In this case, interveners included individuals, environmental groups, businesses and many others. We challenge InsideClimateNews and other advocacy media to ask Sierra Club Canada and other interveners in this case if they have a financial interest in the pipeline.

A complete list of interveners is found here.

Share |

Friday, July 1st, 2011

We Confront Reuters on Advocacy Journalism

Reuters has been using an environmental activist to cover Koch Industries and is misleading readers by pretending he is objective. This is dishonest and journalistically irresponsible.

We first raised the issue after Reuters published news items about Koch Industries by David Sassoon at SolveClimateNews.  SolveClimate is a website focused on “key climate solutions . . . that will have immediate and measurable impact on the pollution-causing climate change.”

When we asked why Reuters permits Sassoon and SolveClimate to cover Koch they told us,

We take feeds from several news organizations on the condition that they uphold Reuters standards. We’re satisfied that SolveClimate, which is a news organization, meets those.”

In a response, we presented Reuters with evidence that Mr. Sassoon and SolveClimate are promoting a single point of view on climate change under the cover of objective journalism.

Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Friday, May 27th, 2011

Reuters Misleads Readers on Koch Industries and the Keystone XL Pipeline. We Respond.

Mr. Jack Reerink
Managing Editor
Reuters

Dear Mr. Reerink:

For the second time in recent weeks, Reuters has permitted an agenda-driven advocacy organization, SolveClimate, to run an article on your news agency about Koch Industries that is factually inaccurate and beneath Reuters’ standards. Here are links to those two articles:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/10/idUS292515702420110210

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/25/idUS336798587820110525

Let me be specific about our concerns:

– We have stated publicly and repeatedly, including last week when questioned by staff of Congressman Waxman, that we have no financial stake in the pipeline that is the subject of the reporting and we are not party to its design or construction. We are not a proposed shipper or customer of oil delivered by this pipeline. We have taken no position on the legislative proposal at issue before Congress and we are not cited in any way in that legislation.


Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

EPA Letter Challenges CBS News Report

Mr. Dan Farber
Editor-in-Chief
CBS News Interactive

Dear Mr. Farber,

I am writing to you to bring to your attention a development that updates and completes one of your recent investigative stories.
On March 15, CBS News Investigates posted a story on its website that appeared to report that Koch Industries was in violation of the Clean Water Act. The lead sentence of the story leaves readers with the strong impression that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was about to file a complaint against the company when, in fact, the complaint was to be filed by two environmental activist groups against a paper mill owned by a Koch subsidiary.

Those activist groups did indeed file a complaint with the EPA and the agency responded to them
Click Here For Full Post »

Share |

Monday, April 19th, 2010

Statement Regarding Greenpeace Report, March 2010

Long before climate change became a key policy issue, Koch companies and Koch foundations were focused on achieving environmental excellence and using resources efficiently. Because of extensive efforts and investments, we have been able to implement innovative practices that reduce energy use and emissions in the manufacture and distribution of our products and achieve superior safety and environmental performance.

This track record has earned local, state, national and international recognition for Koch companies, including more than 180 awards since January 2009. By ignoring our many accomplishments and presenting half facts and inaccuracies about past legal and environmental issues, Greenpeace distorts Koch companies’ environmental record.

In addition, the Greenpeace report’s unsubstantiated and inaccurate assertion – that all funds given by Koch Industries and Koch foundations to a broad group of organizations from 2005 through 2008 were focused on climate issues – breaks down immediately upon examination. As the organizations involved have affirmed, they focus on numerous public policy issues and the funding in question supported many projects outside the scope of energy or environmental matters.

Overall, we believe science – not politicized opinion – must play a central role in the discussion about climate and related policy proposals. Both a free society and the scientific method require an open and honest airing of all sides, not demonizing and silencing those with whom you disagree. In a consistent, principled effort for more than 40 years, Koch companies and Koch foundations have worked to advance economic freedom and market-based policy solutions to challenges faced by society. History and research show that economic freedom best fosters innovation, environmental protection and improved quality of life for a society.

We will continue to encourage a civil, science-based discussion of the effect of greenhouse gases on the climate, and the potential effects and costs of policies proposed to deal with climate change. The climate-policy debate should include a realistic assessment of which initiatives are likely to result in actual environmental good, and what effects those initiatives would have on the global economy.

Share |